Friday, July 31, 2009
The vote just in 21 -17 in favour of approving the contract. I wonder why 7 councilors did not show up for the meeting?
Some Observations during speeches
- Gord Perks is a rude obnoxious bastard, I got to watch him snicker and make snide comments on camera while the councilor sitting in front of him was speaking.
- Pam McConnel talked about her wonderful vacation in the US but she did arrive back in town in time for the vote.
- Raymond Cho spent his 5 minutes thanking everybody including Home Depot
- Janet Davis spent her 5 minutes contradicting herself." We went into bargaining talks hard line demanding a 0% increase for 3 years" ," the grandfathering of the sick bank was on the table in March" I find it hard to believe she is on the "Executive Committee"
-Case Ootes gave an eloquent speech and refuted all of Mayor Dave's comments from yesterdays press conference.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Here is the summary from local 79 voting session today.
Current Sick Leave Provisions
Grand-parenting of the Sick-Leave Plan: Article 11
- Members currently covered by Article 11 of the full-time agreement will be able to stay in the current sick leave plan.
- There will be no changes or reductions in your entitlement under Article 11.
- You will continue to accrue sick days as per Article 11.
- Your cash-out (Retirement Gratuity) is unaffected.
Serious incident: Employees who are witness to, or involved in, a serious incident at work shall be given the balance of the workday off, with pay.
So tell me Dave who is telling the truth. The city is still on the hook for a 249 million and growing payout for unused sick days. It does not look like the sick bank has been eliminated.
Where are you going to get the money to pay this one?Dave If you add up the yearly increases in the contract it is 6% over 3 years not the 5.2% you stated in your news conference. You also forgot to mention they got another holiday added to the contract(Family Day).
So tell me Dave when will the lying stop?
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Mayor Dave's Twitter post June 28
A new collective agreement will not help you effectively deliver public services. In order to accomplish that you will also need to have responsible and effective management something that is sorely lacking in the city of Toronto.
Here is one example of the many management problems from the latest auditor general's report regarding audits of Toronto Water in July 2007
The General Manager, Toronto Water Division, direct that detailed overtime analyses be performed to determine whether the amount of overtime is reasonable and necessary in the wastewater plants. Such overtime analyses should identify reasons for overtime and trends among work areas and positions within the plants.
This is what happened
The Plant Managers were not given a specific directive regarding the performance of overtime analyses. Current overtime analyses performed by the plants provide basic information, which does not identify trends among work areas and positions, but does alert plant management to unusual increases in overtime.
Reasons for overtime are documented and reviewed by the Team Coordinator and Plant Manager as each instance occurs.
The General Manager, Toronto Water Division, ensure that the staff in the Toronto Water Division are aware of their responsibilities relating to the attendance management program and require that employee absenteeism is regularly monitored in accordance with City policy.
This is what happened
Although management staff were reminded of their responsibilities relating to the attendance management program, audit testing found a lack of documented evidence to show that the attendance management program was being followed consistently.
Dave you have some serious management problems why not try solving some to them. Then you can tell us your version of a fair contract.
The only thing you talk about is the sick bank and wages. I am sure there are other issues on the table but you have decided not to publicize these issues. Might they make you look bad?
Dave while you are at it how about that "little organic waste problem" you are having. Maybe you should re-calculate you waste diversion problems.
While you are doing that perhaps you can tell us how may times you or any of your executive committee have actually walked in the front door of city hall in the past two weeks. If they are not going to show up for work do they really deserve to get paid or are they dipping into their sick bank?